![]() And on TikTok, teenagers are discussing and debating them. According to the San Francisco-based company, Life360 had over 18 million monthly active users at the end of 2018.Īpps like Life360 can give kids and parents a sense of security, but they also raise questions about privacy and children’s autonomy. The service is free to download and use, although you can pay for additional features. The app functions like an enhanced version of Apple’s “Find My” feature that lets you share your location with friends or family-or what the company calls “your Circle.” In addition to location sharing, Life360 lets family members see how fast people in their circle are driving, how much battery their cell phones have, and more. Life360 is one of the many digital monitoring tools now used by millions of parents in the United States. In a separate study from 2016, 16 percent said they used location-sharing apps. In a Pew Research Center study last year, 58 percent of US parents said they sometimes or often look at their teenager’s messages, call logs, and the websites they visit. Parents can now remotely check their child’s browsing histories and social media accounts, watch their movements via motion-sensing cameras, and track everywhere they go with location-sharing apps. Schools are adopting facial recognition technology to monitor campuses. That’s because for many adolescents, adult supervision has turned into adult surveillance. Some of the videos have racked up hundreds of thousands of likes-in other words, they’re relatable. As one girl with long, blond hair jokes in a popular TikTok clip, it’s set her summer vacation on fire. The service allows parents to track their kids’ whereabouts in real time, among other features. That’s because Life360, a location-sharing app aimed at families, is apparently ruining the lives of teenagers all across the United States. Its not 10/10 in my book.Spend enough time on the social media app TikTok, and you’re bound to see a Life360 meme. He's funny in real life and was funny in rocky but its hit and miss and it shows here in some scenes. One thing I will say is sly does have issues coming across as funny and I don't know why. Sly & van damme's fight could have been a bit longer but I guess after all the chaos leading up to that point it was sufficient enough without getting too silly, reminded me of a Rocky fight here and there.he he One liners were good, dolph was great, the girl is good also, be good to see her in exp3, locations and sets fab, cgi was not obvious and edited well. Fight scenes were better this time round, not too prolonged, timed well, and the one on ones didn't drag on too long. ![]() ![]() The story pretty much straight forward, better than the first, but nothing special, some dialogue was hard to hear, and sly does try to be serious in some scenes which got a laugh and I don't think its how it was intended but its not that much of a big deal really as there are funny moments in the film, more so than the first film. Norris is great, seen here and there, great entrance and more of a cameo, and van damme makes good his role as the villain. Arnie, bruce are seen more but are not seen as much as the usual gang, and li is seen the least. No time from opening credits, its straight into the action, which is more epic imo, and is what should have been seen in the first film but maybe due to a low budget we were subjected to a lesser affair The team work well, all of them and Hemsworth does really well as the new boy on the block and second time round and you kind of know these guys. thank god, more locations, funnier and better put together. ![]() First off, yes, much better than the first.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |